Read the evidence
Greek lines, Murray’s expanded English spans, narrator or speaker, interpretation and limits.
Open 73 scenes →Classics Reception · magalia.wiki
What is eaten, by whom, with whose permission—and what eating does to the journey home.
The poem makes eating a question of hospitality, ownership, divine warning and return. These records describe narrative situations; they do not prescribe a modern diet or a universal list of permitted species. · 食物的许可取决于具体情境。
Greek lines, Murray’s expanded English spans, narrator or speaker, interpretation and limits.
Open 73 scenes →Compare ordinary feasts, forbidden cattle, fish, hunger, lotus, drugs and wine with other Homer collections.
Explore food evidence →Edition fingerprints, scholarly notes with printed-page citations, known textual controls and reusable data.
Sources and method →Ordinary sustenance and hospitality; distinguish bread from unspecified accompaniments.
Provision, ritual grain and potion ingredient; the same substance has several uses.
Named in fields, an abundance simile and animal feeding; these loci do not narrate a wheat dish.
Named as a landscape cereal; modern species identification is uncertain and no human serving is described here.
Retain indeterminacy: eidata and opsa must not be silently converted to a fixed list of vegetables or meats.
Ordinary edible livestock in many feasts; Helios's particular animals are prohibited.
Food animals and ritual victims; the warning also covers Helios's sheep, not just cattle.
Wild goats are hunted; domestic goats appear in the suitors' preparation; a goat paunch is prepared.
Accepted meat in hospitality and sacrifices; status differs between small piglets and honour portions.
A hunted stag sustains the crew; no full sacrificial sequence is narrated.
Edible roasted animal innards and human entrails in cannibalism must remain distinct.
Fatty chine portions mark honour; fat is also used in offerings and filled paunches.
Prepared animal blood is a named food; ritual blood for shades and human cannibalism are different contexts.
Explicit in Polyphemus's consumption of humans; not an ordinary human marrow dish in this dossier.
Dairy production, Polyphemus's drink and ritual mixture; milk is not declared forbidden to people.
Actually eaten by Odysseus's men; also a potion ingredient and a mythic nourishment.
Potion, libation, mythic nourishment and funeral use; honey-sweet lotus is a descriptor, not proof of added honey.
Ordinary drink, libation, gift, intoxicant and drug vehicle; mixing and restraint matter.
Drinking provision, libation, ritual substitution and denied drink; separate washing water from drinking water.
Mentioned through cultural contrast and an idiom of minimal generosity; no Greek salt prohibition follows.
Cultivation, inaccessible underworld fruit and remembered orchard; not a narrated human fruit serving here.
Orchard abundance and Tantalus's unreachable fruit; explicit consumption is not described in these loci.
Cultivation, punishment and home recognition rather than an explicitly eaten dish.
Fruit availability and memory; no dried-fig serving is inferred.
Orchard and inaccessible fruit; olive timber or an olive tree shelter elsewhere is not automatically food evidence.
Grapes are grown, dried and trodden in Book 7; wine is separately explicit. Raisins served at table are not established.
Stored oil, bathing oil and funeral unguents; these loci do not establish ordinary culinary oil use.
Human procurement and prosperity imagery occur; separate fish-like human victims and a corpse simile. No general fish ban is stated.
Birds are sought under hunger; dream geese are a different evidence class. No species-specific crew meal is given.
A dangerous food because it diverts return; botanical identification is unresolved.
Landscape and fodder context; do not equate these with the dangerous lotus meal.
An onion skin comparison names the plant; a human onion meal is not narrated at this locus.
Swine fodder offered to transformed men; neither ordinary human approval nor universal inedibility follows.
Actual food of divine characters; distinguish Polyphemus's metaphor for wine.
Effects and intentions are described; neither chemical identity nor modern edible dosage is established.
God-given protective herb with black root and white flower; not a securely identified modern ingredient.
Monstrous predation turns guests and sailors into food; no human dietary endorsement is present.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Bread, meat and wine repeatedly sustain accepted hospitality. Hunger can justify asking to eat and sharing with a needy visitor.
This is a synthesis of scenes and speeches, not a modern nutrition prescription or an explicit universal command.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
The suitors' fault concerns consuming another household's wealth without proper reciprocity. The same food types can be legitimate elsewhere.
Penelope, Telemachus and Eumaios have distinct rhetorical situations; their words are not an independent legal code.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
This is the clearest explicit food-related prohibition: named divine herds, repeated warnings, an oath and destruction after the breach.
Other cattle are eaten in accepted feasts. Hunger explains the crew's reasoning but does not cancel the warning in the plot.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
The lotus makes its eaters want to remain; Circe intends her drugs to erase homeland memory. Continued pleasant feasting can also delay return.
Lotus effect, Circe's intention and the men's retained minds are separate propositions; delay is not identical to poisoning.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Monstrous human consumption reverses hospitality. Eumaios's welcome supplies a positive contrast.
This is a narrative ethical inference; no prose dietary code is recited by the poet.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Wine supports meals and ritual, but intoxication and adulteration create dangers. Antinous's warning is about excessive drinking.
The poem supplies no health-safe quantity, alcohol percentage or blanket ban on wine.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
The crew perform sacrificial actions on animals they were told to spare. Ritual vocabulary and roasting cannot make that act legitimate.
Calling the meal anti-sacrifice is scholarly interpretation. No general rule against all substitutes for barley or wine is independently established.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Fish are sought under hunger and included in an image of just prosperity. No general command forbidding fish is found in the cited evidence.
These loci do not reconstruct an everyday fish menu; metaphoric fish and monster prey must be excluded from actual human consumption counts.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Ambrosia and nectar, blood for the dead, swine fodder and funeral honey have different consumers or uses.
Do not turn every named substance into an approved mortal menu or infer a gender-based prohibition from Calypso's meal.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Honour portions, preparation, service and household stores explain who receives food and who enables the feast.
The narrative privileges visible feasts; silence about other household diners is not proof they never ate those foods.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Crop descriptions, metaphors, dreams and inaccessible fruit are food-related evidence with weaker consumption status than an actual meal.
Modern species identification and recipes must remain unresolved where the poem does not decide them.
qualified synthesis / interpretation
Food helps organise civilised, divine and monstrous settings, and ties return to a functioning household.
Structural readings are useful but do not turn all first-person travel stories, a fabricated Cretan tale or miraculous gardens into archaeological facts.