[
  {
    "id": "R01",
    "title": "Eat to sustain life and receive or offer hospitality",
    "category": "ordinary",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P02",
      "P06",
      "P18",
      "P21",
      "P49",
      "P54",
      "P73"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q01",
      "Q04"
    ],
    "claim": "Bread, meat and wine repeatedly sustain accepted hospitality. Hunger can justify asking to eat and sharing with a needy visitor.",
    "limitation": "This is a synthesis of scenes and speeches, not a modern nutrition prescription or an explicit universal command."
  },
  {
    "id": "R02",
    "title": "Permission depends on whose resources are consumed",
    "category": "contested",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P03",
      "P50",
      "P58",
      "P65"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q03",
      "Q06"
    ],
    "claim": "The suitors' fault concerns consuming another household's wealth without proper reciprocity. The same food types can be legitimate elsewhere.",
    "limitation": "Penelope, Telemachus and Eumaios have distinct rhetorical situations; their words are not an independent legal code."
  },
  {
    "id": "R03",
    "title": "Do not harm Helios's cattle or sheep",
    "category": "prohibited",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P01",
      "P40",
      "P43",
      "P44",
      "P46",
      "P47",
      "P48"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q02",
      "Q06"
    ],
    "claim": "This is the clearest explicit food-related prohibition: named divine herds, repeated warnings, an oath and destruction after the breach.",
    "limitation": "Other cattle are eaten in accepted feasts. Hunger explains the crew's reasoning but does not cancel the warning in the plot."
  },
  {
    "id": "R04",
    "title": "Avoid food that diverts the return home",
    "category": "dangerous",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P23",
      "P33",
      "P38"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q02",
      "Q09"
    ],
    "claim": "The lotus makes its eaters want to remain; Circe intends her drugs to erase homeland memory. Continued pleasant feasting can also delay return.",
    "limitation": "Lotus effect, Circe's intention and the men's retained minds are separate propositions; delay is not identical to poisoning."
  },
  {
    "id": "R05",
    "title": "Do not become a host who consumes the guest",
    "category": "prohibited",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P28",
      "P31",
      "P51"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q02"
    ],
    "claim": "Monstrous human consumption reverses hospitality. Eumaios's welcome supplies a positive contrast.",
    "limitation": "This is a narrative ethical inference; no prose dietary code is recited by the poet."
  },
  {
    "id": "R06",
    "title": "Wine is permitted, but its effects and manipulation matter",
    "category": "dangerous",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P02",
      "P26",
      "P29",
      "P09",
      "P33",
      "P67"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q05"
    ],
    "claim": "Wine supports meals and ritual, but intoxication and adulteration create dangers. Antinous's warning is about excessive drinking.",
    "limitation": "The poem supplies no health-safe quantity, alcohol percentage or blanket ban on wine."
  },
  {
    "id": "R07",
    "title": "Ritual performance does not authorize forbidden acquisition",
    "category": "prohibited",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P07",
      "P46",
      "P47",
      "P51"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q06",
      "Q07",
      "Q08"
    ],
    "claim": "The crew perform sacrificial actions on animals they were told to spare. Ritual vocabulary and roasting cannot make that act legitimate.",
    "limitation": "Calling the meal anti-sacrifice is scholarly interpretation. No general rule against all substitutes for barley or wine is independently established."
  },
  {
    "id": "R08",
    "title": "Fish are marginal in banquet scenes, but not prohibited",
    "category": "ordinary",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P10",
      "P45",
      "P59",
      "P69"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q04"
    ],
    "claim": "Fish are sought under hunger and included in an image of just prosperity. No general command forbidding fish is found in the cited evidence.",
    "limitation": "These loci do not reconstruct an everyday fish menu; metaphoric fish and monster prey must be excluded from actual human consumption counts."
  },
  {
    "id": "R09",
    "title": "Keep human food, divine food, ritual substances and fodder distinct",
    "category": "reference",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P13",
      "P14",
      "P39",
      "P34",
      "P71",
      "P29"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q02",
      "Q04"
    ],
    "claim": "Ambrosia and nectar, blood for the dead, swine fodder and funeral honey have different consumers or uses.",
    "limitation": "Do not turn every named substance into an approved mortal menu or infer a gender-based prohibition from Calypso's meal."
  },
  {
    "id": "R10",
    "title": "Distribution and labour are part of the food system",
    "category": "ordinary",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P08",
      "P20",
      "P51",
      "P52",
      "P12",
      "P04",
      "P53"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q01",
      "Q04",
      "Q10"
    ],
    "claim": "Honour portions, preparation, service and household stores explain who receives food and who enables the feast.",
    "limitation": "The narrative privileges visible feasts; silence about other household diners is not proof they never ate those foods."
  },
  {
    "id": "R11",
    "title": "A plant name or simile does not establish an eaten dish",
    "category": "reference",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P11",
      "P17",
      "P61",
      "P62",
      "P42",
      "P72"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q03",
      "Q10"
    ],
    "claim": "Crop descriptions, metaphors, dreams and inaccessible fruit are food-related evidence with weaker consumption status than an actual meal.",
    "limitation": "Modern species identification and recipes must remain unresolved where the poem does not decide them."
  },
  {
    "id": "R12",
    "title": "Read food geography as literary evidence with historical limits",
    "category": "reference",
    "evidence_status": "qualified synthesis / interpretation",
    "passages": [
      "P24",
      "P30",
      "P59",
      "P17",
      "P22",
      "P60"
    ],
    "scholarship_notes": [
      "Q01",
      "Q02",
      "Q03"
    ],
    "claim": "Food helps organise civilised, divine and monstrous settings, and ties return to a functioning household.",
    "limitation": "Structural readings are useful but do not turn all first-person travel stories, a fabricated Cretan tale or miraculous gardens into archaeological facts."
  }
]